index message archive theme
Please pick 1 post size.

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo? 

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

Thank you for your time.

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

Posted at 6.03pm, on 28/11/11, with 328,421 notes.
Originally by f-ckkkkk, reblogged via clubsbullpenisumbrella.
  1. over10000notes reblogged this from we-will-win
  2. deans--girl reblogged this from englandsprincessbride
  3. englandsprincessbride reblogged this from little-miss-china
  4. mewnationofmischief reblogged this from dothewibblywobblytimeywimeything
  5. captainbunnyofsnow reblogged this from atomic1upchickia
  6. windblowstimeglows reblogged this from naitorando
  7. atomic1upchickia reblogged this from arendalphaeagle
  8. sherlock-is-my-cup-of-tea reblogged this from deducing-a-pancake
  9. londoncallingandcupsoftea reblogged this from deducing-a-pancake
  10. inthesearchofsomething reblogged this from deducing-a-pancake
  11. irrelevant-identity reblogged this from caaaaaww
  12. deducing-a-pancake reblogged this from thesebemahdoodles
  13. pokerfaceforall reblogged this from astromaticsailor
  14. lavendermedia reblogged this from chie-arale
  15. trufruit reblogged this from chie-arale
  16. knockabout-pigeon reblogged this from callow-maturity
  17. orangeyoda reblogged this from arendalphaeagle
  18. arendalphaeagle reblogged this from superscratchkat
  19. superscratchkat reblogged this from chie-arale and added:
    hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahaahahahahahaha
  20. hummusman300 reblogged this from chie-arale
  21. chie-arale reblogged this from qyzxf
  22. qyzxf reblogged this from moochfloatjr
  23. death-note-angel reblogged this from dangerousdragon
  24. cyansnowstar789s-reblog-blog reblogged this from justanotherangrybird
  25. daz-santana reblogged this from therealsongbirddiamondback
  26. eevee64 reblogged this from little-miss-china
  27. justanotherangrybird reblogged this from hermantopia